(Source: mistermarvel, via eamesdatbooty)
(Source: mistermarvel, via eamesdatbooty)
I laughed so hard at this.
(Source: mishasteaparty, via lolahardy)
omg. ALL MY HOMEBOYS/GIRLS. I LOVE Y’ALL, WRITER FRIENDS
(Source: puttingmannersonafeminist)
I believe I’ve seen a comprehensive description of consent once before. Figured I’d contribute as it’s a subject that bears repeating.
Consent is:
- Non-coercive: If you’re cojoling, threatening or otherwise trying to “convince” someone to engage in a sexual act with you, you…
(via eamesdatbooty)
(Source: thoughtsofanantiquechinadoll)
(Source: lareinearlequin)
(Source: fauxcrimes, via wibblywobblycrimeywimey)
(Source: drake-ramoray, via better-clenchup-legolas)
Amorphous Catblob: A Love Story?
(via godlessuniverse)
Texting and e-mail and posting let us present the self we want to be. This means we can edit. And if we wish to, we can delete. Or retouch: the voice, the flesh, the face, the body. Not too much, not too little — just right.
Human relationships are rich; they’re messy and demanding. We have learned the habit of cleaning them up with technology. And the move from conversation to connection is part of this. But it’s a process in which we shortchange ourselves. Worse, it seems that over time we stop caring, we forget that there is a difference.
We are tempted to think that our little “sips” of online connection add up to a big gulp of real conversation. But they don’t. E-mail, Twitter, Facebook, all of these have their places — in politics, commerce, romance and friendship. But no matter how valuable, they do not substitute for conversation.
The Flight From Conversation (via NYT)(Source: The New York Times, via sashanako)
(via absentminded-professor)
The notes
We could rule the world, destroy countries, build fantastic cities made of technologies, declare heterosexuality illegal, pilot every freaking show.
(Source: charizzaaa, via thoughtsofanantiquechinadoll)